Clarifying user intent

I see a user message in Chinese that translates to something about a La Liga referee sending off a former famous official who refereed the AC Milan vs. Liverpool Champions League final. It seems like they’re sharing a news headline, but they haven't asked a specific question. I might want to clarify their intent. Should I provide a summary or more context? It could also be helpful to mention which former referee they're referring to.Interpreting the headline

I see the headline referencing a La Liga referee sending off a former famous referee, which is a bit confusing since a "名哨" refers to a notable official. The match might feature someone related to a past referee like Manuel Mejuto González, who officiated the 2005 UCL final. I'm pondering if this former referee could be a team delegate being sent off from the technical area, like Iturralde González, who has experience as a La Liga ref. However, I'm not sure about the specific context without browsing capabilities.Considering network options

The harness indicates that if I’m not specifically told otherwise, I should assume I have network access and the ability to perform searches. Since I’m operating in a command-line interface (CLI), I could potentially use commands like curl to gather information. The environment defaults to having network enabled, but there might be restrictions in place. While the user hasn't explicitly asked for details, I think providing context could still be beneficial for clarity. However, this particular situation doesn't seem to be a direct command.Proposing clarifications

I think the best approach here is to ask the user a clarifying question. I could ask something like, "Would you like to know specific details about this news? I can provide a quick summary, key people involved, details about the match and decision, or source links. Which one interests you?"

Also, I could suggest that "昔日名哨" might refer to Manuel Mejuto González, the former elite referee. However, I should frame it as a possibility rather than a certainty. Being concise and offering options will be crucial!

这是条新闻标题吧。你想要我：

1. 查证并给出简要梳理（发生在哪场西甲、被罚下的是谁、具体原因）
2. 解释标题里“昔日名哨”可能指的人（如2005米兰vs利物浦欧冠决赛主裁）
3. 提供原始来源链接

选个编号，或直接说你想了解哪部分。